Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 97
Filter
1.
Lung Cancer ; 178(Supplement 1):S28-S29, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20244049

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Adjuvant anti-cancer systemic therapy (SACT) following lung resection improves overall survival in stage II/II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) National Specialty Report for Lung Cancer recommends centres publish adjuvant SACT rates for National benchmarking and proposes a target of >40% of eligible patients undergo SACT. We report a regional audit into the uptake of adjuvant SACT in Greater Manchester (GM). Method(s): A retrospective case review of all patients undergoing curative-intent NSCLC surgery with a pathological stage of II/III from 01/01/21 to 30/04/21. Data collected included patient demographics, uptake of adjuvant SACT, reasons for no adjuvant SACT and tolerance and complications of SACT. Result(s): 58 patients underwent surgical resection within the audit period and were eligible for adjuvant SACT. Median age was 70 years (range 45 - 81) and 60% were female. 47% (27/58) commenced adjuvant SACT;41% (24/58) were treated with chemotherapy and 7% (4/58) were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. 58% (14/24) of patients that commenced adjuvant chemotherapy completed 4 cycles. Carboplatin/Vinorelbine was the commonest regimen (82%, 18/22). There were no grade III-V complications and no chemotherapy-related deaths. Dose reduction due to toxicity was required in 14% (3/22). The reasons adjuvant systemic therapy was not given were patient choice in 32% (10/31), poor physical health such that risks outweighed benefits in 42% (13/31), and other reasons (e.g. need to treat synchronous primary tumours) in 26% (8/31). COVID-19 was not recorded as a cause for adjuvant omission/ dose reduction. Conclusion(s): This data provides national benchmarking information for adjuvant SACT in NSCLC and suggests the target of >40% is achievable and appropriate. Interventions that improve patient fitness pre- and post-operatively might increase adjuvant SACT uptake. This regional audit will be extended to review all eligible patients in 2021 and further data will be presented. Disclosure: No significant relationships.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

2.
Lung Cancer ; 178(Supplement 1):S36, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20235797

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with adjuvant vinorelbine-platinum chemotherapy experience neutropenia, which may lead to early termination of treatment. However, evidence suggests that survival is superior in patients who complete four cycles of chemotherapy [1]. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) prophylaxis is used to prevent neutropenia. During the COVID pandemic, the threshold for initiating prophylaxis was lowered to reduce need for hospital attendance with the concomitant risk of hospital-acquired infection [2]. We evaluated whether GCSF prophylaxis supported completion of chemotherapy in patients treated at St Bartholomew's Hospital. Method(s): Data was retrospectively collected on the 112 patients with NSCLC who received adjuvant vinorelbine-platinum chemotherapy (total 349 cycles) in the period Jan 2017- Jul 2022. GCSF prophylaxis was prescribed at physician discretion. chi2 tests were carried out using SPSS 28. Result(s): A significantly higher proportion of patients who received GCSF prophylaxis completed four cycles of chemotherapy (chi2=5.120, p=0.024). These patients also experienced a lower incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (chi2=6.801, p=0.009). Over 5 years, 2/112 (1.75%) patients died, both from neutropenic sepsis;neither of these patients received prophylactic GCSF. GCSF prophylaxis was not associated with increase in the incidence of thromboembolic events (chi2=1.462, p=0.442). Conclusion(s): GCSF is safe and effective as primary prophylaxis in NSCLC patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Use of GCSF will reduce proportion of post-operative patients considered too high risk for chemotherapy due to concerns about neutropenia. Disclosure: No significant relationships. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

3.
Endocrine, Metabolic and Immune Disorders Drug Targets Conference: 20th National Congress of the Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, AME ; 23(4), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20232408

ABSTRACT

The proceedings contain 9 papers. The topics discussed include: dulaglutide and NAFLD risk reduction;correlation between plasmatic long pentraxin PTX3 and nodular thyroid disease: a preliminary report;the fructose-bisphosphate aldolase a act as autoantigen in primary autoimmune hypophysitis;cortisol deficiency in Lenvatinib treatment;side effects of mitotane treatment: a retrospective study in 35 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma in adjuvant therapy;non-functioning pituitary adenoma: do predictor factors exist?;incidence and features of adrenal crisis in a series of 133 patients with Addison's disease;serological evidence and self-reported outcomes in patients with adrenal insufficiency during the first waves of COVID-19 in the North-East Italy;and persistent effects of spironolactone after its withdrawal in patients with hyperandrogenic skin disorders.

4.
Rheumatology (United Kingdom) ; 62(Supplement 2):ii135, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2326087

ABSTRACT

Background/Aims A 72-year-old lady presented in primary care with complaints of generalised body aches, bilateral leg weakness and constitutional symptoms following a first dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Blood tests showed slightly raised inflammatory markers. She was initially diagnosed with polymyalgia rheumatica and was started on 40mg prednisolone with minimal improvement. Methods The examination in the rheumatology clinic was unremarkable. Investigations revealed raised white cell count, consistent with high dose steroid treatment, and elevated monocytes. There was mild improvement in inflammatory markers. The working diagnosis was of self-limiting viral illness. Further testing discovered strongly positive MPO ANCA (115 IU/ml), and the patient received three pulses of 500mg methylprednisolone for suspected vasculitis arranged by the medical team. There was no evidence of renal involvement. The diagnosis made at this point was autoimmune inflammatory disorder with unclear aetiology. At the subsequent clinic visit she reported mild shortness of breath, but no other symptoms suggestive of either vasculitis or connective tissue disease. Repeat ANCA showed significant reduction in MPO titre following pulse steroid treatment. CT of chest, abdomen and pelvis demonstrated a localised lobular/ nodular deformity of the liver. Viral hepatitis screen was negative. CA19-9 was raised at 100 U/ml. Liver biopsy was reported as poorly differentiated carcinoma without specific localising immunohistochemical features. Results The patient underwent hemi-hepatectomy for histologically confirmed pT2pNXM0R0 liver cholangiocarcinoma in a tertiary centre followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine. With treatment, her MPO ANCA and CA19-9 levels declined. An interval CT scan of chest, abdomen and pelvis performed ten months after the surgery, showed no recurrence of malignancy. Given the fact that the patient's MPO ANCA fell following the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, it is likely that positive MPO ANCA is associated with underlying malignancy rather than an active vasculitis. Conclusion This unusual case describes an evolution of the diagnostic process guided by non-specific symptoms and ANCA positivity, arriving at an unexpected diagnosis of malignancy. Although ANCA is a sensitive and specific marker of vasculitides, it can be positive in other conditions particularly hepatitis B, inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune liver disorders. Malignancy can also be associated with ANCA in the absence of vasculitis. In one study, of 118 ANCA positive patients without ANCA-associated vasculitis, four were found to have malignancy. In a study of 1024 patients who had ANCA tested, 61 patients were found to have malignancy, predominantly haematological and lung cancers. However, after adjustment for sex, age and time of blood draw, no association was found between ANCA status and incidence of cancer. Interestingly, paraneoplastic vasculitis such as polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) has been described in the context of underlying cholangiocarcinoma, and is associated with ANCA rise. Moreover, patients with raised ANCA and PAN also have raised CA 19- 9.

5.
American Journal of Gastroenterology ; 117(10 Supplement 2):S1207-S1208, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2325086

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Incidental elevations in Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) can trigger extensive medical evaluations for malignancy. Though classically associated with pancreatic cancer, CA19-9 is a nonspecific manifestation of multiple benign and malignant disease processes. Case Description/Methods: An asymptomatic, healthy 50-year-old female presented to primary care for an elevated CA19-9 level obtained for pancreatic cancer screening in Asia in 2019. Her evaluation in 2019 included abdominopelvic CT and magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which were normal. She was offered endoscopic ultrasonography to further evaluate pancreaticobiliary etiologies but was lost to follow-up amid the COVID-19 pandemic. She returned to the US in 2021, and basic laboratory testing and routine cervical cancer screening were performed. She was referred to Gastroenterology (GI) for further evaluation. Cervical cytology revealed atypical endometrial cells, and endometrial biopsy by gynecology was concerning for gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma. Transvaginal ultrasound revealed a thickened endometrial stripe, and pan CT revealed duodenal thickening, for which GI performed bidirectional endoscopy without significant abnormalities and no pancreatic or metastatic disease. Repeat CA19- 9 increased. She was referred to gynecologic oncology, where cervical biopsy and pelvic MRI confirmed an endocervical mass. She was diagnosed with Stage IIB gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma and underwent hysterectomy and left salpingectomy with adjuvant chemoradiation. Discussion(s): CA19-9 is synthesized in multiple organ systems. Elevations in asymptomatic patients are rarely predictive of pancreatic cancer but may expose patients to unnecessary testing and inadvertent harms without identifying malignancy. Thus, CA19-9 is not recommended for pancreatic cancer screening. Incidental elevations do warrant repeat testing. Benign processes will yield stable or decreasing levels, while rising levels suggest progressive or malignant processes. If concern for pancreatic malignancy is low, a reasonable investigation includes chest X-ray or CT, metabolic studies, hemoglobin A1c, liver and thyroid function panels, abdominopelvic CT or gynecologic cancer evaluation, and any other age-indicated cancer screening. In this case, prior imaging studies suggested low concern for pancreatic cancer. Her subsequent evaluation aligned with this suggested work-up and revealed gynecologic cancer as the ultimate etiology for her elevated CA19-9.

6.
PA ; Herzen Journal of Oncology. 10(3):19-24, 2021.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2319542

ABSTRACT

The spread of the aggressive disease caused by the novel respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has had an impact not only on the health and psyche of people, but also on the state of health systems in different countries, by complicating the treatment and diagnostic process. These changes have affected patients with cancers to a greater extent. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients are of particular scientific and practical interest when working in conditions of special anti-epidemic control. Objective. To assess the possibility of reducing the frequency of hospitalization of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) during the Covid-19 period. Subjects and methods. Sixty-four patients with urinary tract malignancy, including 19 (29.7%) patients with low-and high-risk re-current NMIBC, were followed up in two clinics (Saint Petersburg, Russia) in March to October 2020. All the patients were oper-ated on;the patients at high risk for recurrence received a cycle of adjuvant BCG therapy. Methods for cytological examination of urine sediment and the biomarkers UBC and Cyfra 21-1 were used for special laboratory diagnosis;the server stations of both clinics were applied for telehealth consultations (TCs). Results. TCs were used to reduce hospitalization rates: after TCs, all the patients reported a reduction in transport costs and recovery time after hospitalization. TCs could protect the followed-up patients against COVID-19 infection, by observing the rules of clinical examination, and achieve maximum individualization of treatment. The authors refused to perform diagnostic operations for low-risk NMIBC and to use laboratory tests using urinary biomarkers. At the place of their residence, outpatients underwent urinalysis for several indicators, transmitting the result to the clinic's servers or through a monitoring system. Inpatient treatment was used only in cases of gross hematuria or after recording abnormal laboratory test results. Control cystoscopy detected no re-current tumor. Conclusion. During the spread of COVID-19, the periods of endoscopic examinations and control diagnostic operations can be post-poned, by replacing face-to-face consultations with TC monitoring. Outpatient laboratory and radiation examinations are indicat-ed in patients with new-onset gross hematuria or after combination treatment. Repeated operations, including diagnostic ones, should be performed in the case of multiple NMIBCs or after incomplete excision of the primary tumor.Copyright © 2021.

7.
European Urology ; 83(Supplement 1):S1887, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2303060

ABSTRACT

Introduction & Objectives: Bladder preservation is routinely used as an alternative to radical cystectomy in the UK and is becoming more accepted elsewhere globally. The gold standard is for patients to receive radiotherapy with a radiosensitiser most commonly concurrent chemotherapy e.g. 5FU/mitomycin C, gemcitabine or cisplatin. Patients with poor performance status or comorbidities may be unable to be offered concurrent treatment with chemotherapy but alternative treatment with concurrent carbogen +/- nicotinamide as a hypoxic modifier may be of benefit. Our aim therefore was to retrospectively review patients with bladder TCC treated with radical radiotherapy alone in the last 5 years who may have benefited from carbogen +/- nicotinamide radiosensitisation at a large cancer centre in the north of England. Material(s) and Method(s): In this single institution retrospective case note review, electronic records were reviewed for 175 patients who had received radiotherapy to the bladder for TCC between 2017-2022. Patients who had radical radiotherapy (RT) alone without radiosensitisation were scrutinised to ascertain whether they would have been candidates for carbogen and nicotinamide using the inclusion/exclusion criteria previously defined in the Bladder Carbogen Nicotinamide (BCON) Randomised Phase 3 trial. Result(s): We analysed 175 patients. Of these, 133 received had radical RT without radiosensitisation. The most common reason for not offering radiosensitisation was the presence of co-morbidities (27.8%). Of interest, the proportion of patients having chemotherapy radiosensitisation did not change after COVID19 in March 2020 (21.5% pre- vs 27.5% post;p=0.32 chi2). Conversely, the proportion of patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy reduced though failed to reach significance (12.6% pre- vs 5% post;p=0.08 chi2). After review of the notes and criteria from the original BCON trial, 106 patients (79.6%) could have benefited from carbogen +/- nicotinamide. Of these, 14 patients (13.2%) could have been offered carbogen alone due to poor renal function. The most common reason for not being eligible for BCON was respiratory disease with reduced respiratory drive (44%). Conclusion(s): The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) state that all radical RT for bladder TCC should be with a radiosensitiser. Due to logistical and departmental issues, the BCON regimen is not currently offered as a standard alternative to radiosensitisation with chemotherapy. BCON has been demonstrated to be tolerable and, whilst updated follow-up data failed to demonstrate statistical significance for overall survival (OS), meta-analysis of hypoxia modification has shown significant improvement in OS compared to RT alone. Hypoxia modification with carbogen +/- nicotinamide should be considered for all patients unsuitable for chemotherapy radiosensitisation.Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

8.
Adverse Drug Reactions Journal ; 22(3):147-150, 2020.
Article in Chinese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2294454
9.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; : 34894221111093, 2022 Jul 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304063

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: So far, no original studies explored non-randomized, standardized protocols for COVID-19 associated olfactory dysfunction. The main objective was to determine the efficacy of a new protocol for post-COVID olfactopathy while assessing the benefit of adding adjuvant therapies to olfactory training. METHODS: Patients suffering from long-lasting post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction were evaluated. A non-randomized protocol based on individual nasal endoscopy findings and patient's preferences was applied. Patients were assigned for olfactory training alone or olfactory training + adjuvant therapy. Participants performed olfactory objective and subjective evaluations at first consultation and 3 months after treatment, and results were compared. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were enrolled. All groups showed significant improvement in olfactory thresholds at 3-month follow-up suggesting protocol effectiveness (olfactory training group alone showed a mean threshold difference of 2.9, P < .001; Olfactory training + Topical Corticosteroid showed a mean threshold difference of 4, P = .006; Olfactory training + Topical Corticosteroid + Vitamin B complex showed a mean threshold difference of 4.4, P = .006; Olfactory training + Intranasal Vitamin A and E showed a mean threshold difference of 4.4, P < .001). Olfactory training alone showed lower mean olfactory threshold improvement, when compared to patients undergoing olfactory training + adjuvant therapy (olfactory training alone mean improvement 2.9 ± 2.3 vs olfactory training + adjuvants mean improvement 4.3 ± 2.458, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies to demonstrate results in the treatment of post-COVID-19 persistent olfactory impairment. A customized approach based on endoscopy findings and patient's preferences may be a valid option for the management of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory disorder. Adjuvant therapy could be considered in addition to olfactory training, but further studies are needed in order to confirm their effectiveness in this setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c (outcomes research).

10.
Coronaviruses ; 2(10) (no pagination), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2270427

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was originated first in Wuhan, Chi-na, in December 2019, and it is known to be caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coron-avirus-2 (SARS CoV-2). The management of COVID-19 could be achieved by means of the usage of the repurposed drugs, inhibiting the viral entry and/or viral fusion such as umifenovir, Barici-tinib, Camostat mesylate, Nafamostat mesylate, and the drugs blocking the viral replication, which include favipiravir, remdesivir, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Ribavirin, Sofosbuvir, chloroquine and Hydrox-ychloroquine. Objective(s): Along with the drugs that target the SARS-CoV-2 virus, adjunctive therapies are also employed. This review focuses on the adjuvant therapies employed to manage the COVID-19-asso-ciated complications, such as cytokine storm, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), respiratory failure, cardiac injury, coagulopathy, and multi-organ failure. Method(s): The literature was searched in databases such as Medline/PubMed Central/PubMed, Goo-gle Scholar, Science Direct, EBSCO, Scopus, EMBASE, Directory of open access journals (DOA-J), and reference lists to identify relevant articles. Result(s): Various studies have been identified for the use of corticosteroids, interferons, monoclon-al antibodies, etoposide, ruxolitinib, anticoagulants, convalescent plasma, immunoglobulins, mes-enchymal stem cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and inhaled nitric oxide (NO) as adjuvant therapy to manage the patients with COVID-19 along with the repurposed drugs targeting SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion(s): The safety and efficacy of adjuvant therapy are needed to be confirmed by various ongoing randomized controlled clinical trials.Copyright © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers.

11.
Clinical Trials ; 20(Supplement 1):14-15, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2268882

ABSTRACT

Background In May 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a revised draft guidance for industry on ''Adjustment for Covariates in Randomized Clinical Trials for Drugs and Biological Products.'' This guidance discusses adjustment for covariates in the statistical analysis of randomized clinical trials in drug development programs. It specifically focuses on the use of prognostic baseline factors to improve precision for estimating treatment effects. The impact depends on the specifics of the trial, but typical sample size reductions range from 5-25% (at no cost). Despite regulators such as the FDA and the European Medicines Agency recommending covariate adjustment, it remains highly underutilized leading to inefficient trials in many disease areas. This is especially true for binary, ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes, which are quite common in COVID-19 trials and are, moreover, prevalent as primary outcomes in many disease areas (e.g. Alzheimer's disease and stroke). Research and guidance on this topic could therefore not be more timely. In response to the FDA draft guidance on covariate adjustment, this session invites experts who represent a variety of viewpoints, coming from academia and Pharmaceutical industry. The aim of this session is to provide insight into the state-of-the-art methods at a high level and from a practical perspective. We moreover want to discuss the main obstacles that lead to the underutilization of covariate adjustment, all of which we aim to surmount in this session. Finally, we want to discuss the connections of the different talks to the FDA draft guidance and provide options for better practice. Talk by Min Zhang ''Covariate adjustment for randomized clinical trials when covariates are subject to missingness.'' One practical issue that may have limited the use of covariate adjustment is that covariates are often subject to missingness. Existing statistical methodologies often ignore this issue and assume covariates are completely observed. We discuss conditions under which robust covariate adjustment can be achieved when the missingness of covariates is present. We study various methods for handling missing data and compare their performances in terms of robustness and efficiency through comprehensive simulation studies. Recommendations on strategies for handling missing covariates to achieve robust covariate adjustment are provided. Talk by Mark van der Laan on ''Targeted Learning of causal effects in randomized Trials with continuous time-to-event outcomes.'' Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) provides a general methodology for estimation of causal parameters in the presence of high-dimensional nuisance parameters. Generally, TMLE consists of a twostep procedure that combines data-adaptive nuisance parameter estimation with semi-parametric efficiency and rigorous statistical inference obtained via a targeted update step. In this talk, we demonstrate the practical applicability of TMLE for standard survival and competing risks settings where event times are not confined to take place on a discrete and finite grid. We demonstrate TMLE updates that simultaneously target point-treatment-specific survival curves and treatmentcause- specific subdistributions in the competing risk setting, across treatment and time points. We consider the case that we only observe baseline covariates as well as the case that we also track time-dependent covariates that potentially inform censoring/drop-out. This results in estimates that are not only fully efficient, but also respect the natural monotonicity of survival functions and cause-specific subdistributions. It moreover makes sure that the sum of subdistributions and survival equals 1. We propose a super-learner for the causespecific conditional hazards that incorporate many possible Cox models as well as a variety of highly adaptive Lasso estimators. Asymptotic theoretical guarantees are given and finite-sample robust performance is demonstrated with simulations. We illustrate the usage of the considered methods for a ovo Nordisk Leader study as well as for publicly available data from a trial on adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. Talk by Kelly Van Lancker on ''Combining Covariate Adjustment with Information Monitoring and Group Sequential Designs to Improve Randomized Trial Efficiency'' In this talk, we focus on the knowledge gap in statistical methodology that leads to the underutilization of covariate adjustment. A first obstacle is the uncertainty of its efficiency gain and corresponding sample size reduction at the design stage;an incorrect projection of a covariate's prognostic value risks an over- or underpowered future trial. A second open problem is the incompatibility of many covariate-adjusted estimators with the commonly used group sequential, information-based designs (GSDs). To overcome these challenges, we suggest combining covariate adjustment with information monitoring and continuing the trial until the required information level is surpassed. Since adjusted estimators typically have smaller variance than standard estimators, the information accrues faster leading to faster trials. Building on this, we propose a new statistical method that orthogonalizes estimators in order to (1) have the independent increments property needed to apply GSDs and (2) simultaneously improve (or leave unchanged) the variance at each analysis. Such a method is needed in order to fully leverage prognostic baseline variables to speed up clinical trials without sacrificing validity or power. We prove that this method has properties such as the independent increments, consistency, asymptotic normality, and correct type I error and power, and evaluate its performance in simulations and data analyses. Discussion by Frank Bretz This talk will discuss connections between the three previous presentations in the session and recommendations in the May 2021 FDA revised draft guidance for industry document on ''Adjustment for Covariates in Randomized Clinical Trials for Drugs and Biological Products.'' It will moreover touch on the broad impact of covariate adjustment for the pharmaceutical industry and provide advice on better practice.

12.
Dermatologica Sinica ; 40(4):237-238, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2267808
13.
Indian J Cancer ; 2022 Oct 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2281596

ABSTRACT

Background: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has hard-pressed the health care systems beyond their capabilities, causing a lack of appropriate cancer treatment delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of pandemic-related restrictions on adjuvant therapy delivery for oral cancer patients during these demanding times. Materials and Methods: Oral cancer patients who were operated on between February and July 2020 and scheduled to receive prescribed adjuvant therapy during the COVID-19-related restrictions (Group I) were included in the study. The data were matched for the length of hospital stay and type of prescribed adjuvant therapy, with a set of patients who were similarly managed 6 months preceding the restrictions (Group II). Demographic and treatment-specific details, including inconveniences faced in procuring prescribed treatment, were obtained. Factors associated with delay in receiving adjuvant therapy were compared using regression models. Results: A total of 116 oral cancer patients were considered for analysis, comprising 69% (n = 80) adjuvant radiotherapy alone and 31% (n = 36) concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The mean hospital stay was 13 days. In Group I, 29.3% (n = 17) of patients were not able to receive any form of their prescribed adjuvant therapy at all, which was 2.43 times higher than Group II (P = 0.038). None of the disease-related factors significantly predicted delay in receiving adjuvant therapy. Of the delay, 76.47% (n = 13) was present during the initial part of the restrictions, with the most common reason being unavailability of appointments (47.1%, n = 8), followed by inability to reach treatment centers (23.5%, n = 4) and redeem reimbursements (23.5%, n = 4). The number of patients who were delayed the start of radiotherapy beyond 8 weeks after surgery was double in Group I (n = 29) than in Group II (n = 15; P = 0.012). Conclusions: This study highlights a small part of the rippling effect the COVID-19 restrictions have on oral cancer management and pragmatic actions may be needed by policymakers to deal with such challenges.

14.
Mini Rev Med Chem ; 2023 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2248382

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), a serious pandemic due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, caused significant lockdowns, healthcare shortages, and deaths worldwide. The infection leads to an uncontrolled systemic inflammatory response causing severe respiratory distress and multiple-organ failure. Quick development of several vaccines efficiently controlled the spread of COVID-19. However, the rise of various new subvariants of COVID-19 demonstrated some concerns over the efficacy of existing vaccines. Currently, better vaccines to control these variants are still under development as several new subvariants of COVID-19, such as omicron BA-4, BA-5, and BF-7 are still impacting the world. Few antiviral treatments have been shown to control COVID-19 symptoms. Further, control of COVID-19 symptoms has been explored with many natural and synthetic adjuvant compounds in hopes of treating the deadly and contagious disease. Vitamins have been shown to modulate the immune system, function as antioxidants, and reduce the inflammatory response. Recent studies have investigated the potential role of vitamins, specifically vitamins A, B, C, D, and E, in reducing the immune and inflammatory responses and severity of the complication. In this brief article, we discussed our current understanding of the role of vitamins in controlling COVID-19 symptoms and their potential use as adjuvant therapy.

15.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging ; 49(Supplement 1):S167, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2219962

ABSTRACT

Aim/Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), like targeting programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1), have revolutionized anti-cancer treatments, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [1, 2]. Assessment of PD-L1 expression on tumor biopsies is current practice, but there is a need for additional biomarkers correlating to the complex mechanism of action of ICI. The presence of tumorinfiltrating CD8+ T-cells (TILs) is a robust biomarker associated with immune therapy success [3]. Tools to track TILs in patients during ICI treatment allow further development of immune-oncology drugs. Material(s) and Method(s): This ongoing single-center prospective study (NCT03853187) includes patients with histologically proven T1b-3N0-1M0 NSCLC eligible for resection. Exclusion criteria are previous anti-cancer therapy and known immune disorders or suppression. Patients receive two courses neo-adjuvant durvalumab (750mg Q2W), after which TIL imaging is performed. Cohort 1 underwent apheresis and magnetic-activated cells sorting to isolate 100 x10e6 autologous CD8+ T-cells for cell labeling with 111In-oxine. Re-injection was followed by 4h post-injection (p.i.) planar imaging, 70h p.i. SPECT imaging, standard-of-care surgery and 78h p.i. uSPECT of the resected lobe. Patients in cohort 2 (ongoing) receive 1.5mg 89Zr-Df-crefmirlimab followed by PET/CT 24h p.i. Result(s): In cohort 1, 8/10 patients underwent apheresis and TIL imaging;one procedure was withdrawn due to COVID-19 restrictions and one due to unsuccessful T-cell isolation. Yield ranged 240-714 x10e6 CD8+ T-cells, purity 84%-97% and cell viability 92%-100%. Labeling efficacy of 100 x10e6 cells for re-injection ranged 42%-64% and injected activity 22,4-36,7 MBq In-111.TIL imaging was completed by 4/5 patients in cohort 2, one subject discontinued neo-adjuvant treatment due to post-obstruction pneumonia.Tumor-to-bloodpool were determined to quantify specific TIL accumulation in the tumor. Our results favor quantification of T-cells on PET over SPECT given its higher sensitivity and spatial resolution. Correlation of imaging findings with density of CD8+ T-cells in the resected tumor is currently ongoing. Conclusion(s): We implemented two methods for tracking CD8+ T-cells in earlystage NSCLC patients after neo-adjuvant durvalumab treatment. Although ex vivo cell labeling perhaps more specifically targets migrating TILs into the tumor, 89Zr-Df-crefmirlimab has the potential to also target residing cells. Quantitative correlation with presence of TILs in the resected tumor will help to determine the role of these imaging tools in the development of immune-oncology drugs.

16.
Immuno-Oncology and Technology ; Conference: ESMO Immuno-Oncology Congress 2022. Geneva Switzerland. 16(Supplement 1) (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2210536

ABSTRACT

Background: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (CheckMate 816 regimen) has become a standard of care in treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in some countries. Addition of radiation therapy (RT) may further improve local control in locally advanced NSCLC patients. Here, we report the primary endpoint, major pathologic response (MPR), of the SQUAT trial (WJOG 12119L, JapicCTI- 195069)-a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II trial of neoadjuvant concurrent chemo-immuno-radiation therapy followed by surgical resection and adjuvant immunotherapy for resectable stage IIIA-B N2 NSCLC. Method(s): Patients with resectable stage IIIA-B N2 NSCLC received concurrent chemoradiotherapy [weekly paclitaxel (40 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC 2) for 5 weeks plus involved-field RT 50 Gy] and immunotherapy [durvalumab (1500 mg) Q4W for 2 cycles] followed by surgical resection and adjuvant immunotherapy (durvalumab for up to 1 year). The primary endpoint was MPR rate according to an independent central review (ICR). We assumed the threshold of the MPR rate to be 40% and the expected rate to be 65% with a significance level alpha=0.05 (one-sided) and power 0.8. The sample size was 31 patients, including the 10% ineligible patients. Result(s): Between Jan 2020 and Feb 2022, 31 patients were enrolled from 10 institutions in Japan. Thirty-one patients were evaluated for safety, and 30 patients for efficacy. Of 30 patients (median age, 64 years), 70% and 63% had clinical stage IIIA and non-squamous histology, respectively. The MPR and pathological complete response (pCR) rates by ICR were 63% (90% CI, 47-78, 95% CI, 44-80) and 20% (95% CI, 8-39), respectively. Complete resection was not performed due to adverse events (2 pts) and disease progression (3 pts). Among 25 patients who received complete resection, the MPR and pCR rates were 76% (95% CI, 55-91) and 24% (95% CI, 9-45), respectively. No 30-day postoperative mortality was reported. Conclusion(s): The primary endpoint of MPR rate was met in SQUAT trial. This result suggests that this treatment strategy is promising for resectable stage IIIA-B N2 NSCLC. Clinical trial identification: JapicCTI-195069. Legal entity responsible for the study: WJOG (West Japan Oncology Group). Funding(s): AstraZeneca. Disclosure: T. Miyoshi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. A. Hamada: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Chugai, Ono Pharmaceuticals;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. J. Soh: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ethicon, Covidien, Intutive;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. A. Hata: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: MSD, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly, Chugai, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim. Y. Yatabe: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Chugai-pharma, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Thermo Fisher Science, ArcherDx, Novartis, Elli-Lily, Daiichi Sankyo, Jansen-Pharma, Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Thermo Fisher Science, ArcherDx, AstraZeneca. J. Suzuki: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. M. Tsuboi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Lecture: Johnson & Johnson Japan;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Lectures, Advisory boards: AstraZeneca KK, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd, MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Lectures: Eli Lilly Japan, Bristol Myers Squibb KK, Teijin Pharma, Taiho Pharma, Medtronic Japan, ONO Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory boards: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Daiichi Sankyo company limited, MSD, AstraZeneca, Novartis;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Beohringer-Ingelheim Japan, MSD, AstraZeneca KK, Ono Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd, Bristol Myers Squibb KK, Novartis;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly Japan. H. Horinouchi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, BMS/ONO, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche/Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kyowa-Kirin, Nihon Kayaku, AbbVie, Roche/Chugai;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, BMS/ONO, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche/Chugai, Amgen, Nihon Kayaku;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche/Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Daiichi Sankyo, ONO pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: AbbVie. I. Yoshino: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. T. Masayuki: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. S. Toyooka: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Chugai, Taiho, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Kyorin, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Johnson and Johnson;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Kyorin;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Illumina, Eurofins, Taiho, Chugai, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca. M. Okada: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. T. Go: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. M. Yamashita: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. N. Yamamoto: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD K.K, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Nippon Kayaku, GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Sanofi K.K., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co.,Inc., Merk biopharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Nippon Kayaku, Life Technologies Japan Ltd., Amgen Inc., Guardant Health Japan, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: MSD K.K;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Ono Pharm ceutical Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Amgen Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Toppan printing, Terumo. K. Nakagawa: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Amgen Inc., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., CMIC ShiftZero K.K., Life Technologies Japan Ltd., Neo Communication, Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 3H Clinical Trial Inc., Care Net, Inc., Medical Review Co., Ltd., Medical Mobile Communications co., Ltd, Yodosha Co., Ltd., Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Japan Clinical Research Operations, CMIC Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Taiyo Pharma Co., Ltd.;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Ono Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K.;Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, patents sales fee: Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Parexel International Corp., Pra Healthsciences, Eps Corporation., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., EPS International Co.,Ltd,., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., MSD K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., PPD-SNBL K.K, SymBio Pharmaceuticals Limited., IQVIA Services Japan K.K., Syneos Health Clinical K.K., Nippon Kayaku Co.,Ltd., EP-CRSU Co., Ltd., Mebix, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Covance Japan Inc., Japan linical Research Operations, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Sanofi K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co.,Ltd., Sysmex Corporation, Medical Reserch Support, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Amgen Inc., Novartis Pharma K.K., Novartis Pharma K.K., Srl, Inc. T. Mitsudomi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Chugai, Novartis, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Novartis, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono, Pfizer, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Eli-Lilly;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Chugai, MSD, Taiho, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Interanational Association for Study of Lung Cancer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Copyright © 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology

17.
Bulletin of Urooncology ; 21(4):134-139, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2202254

ABSTRACT

Objective: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused significant delays in the diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), like many diseases. We investigated the effect of delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological outcomes in NMIBC. Material(s) and Method(s): The patients diagnosed and followed up with primary bladder cancer between October 2017 and August 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into groups the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods. Result(s): A total of 93 patients were included, 54 (58.1%) in the pre-COVID-19 and 39 (41.9%) in the COVID-19 group. The median time from symptoms to diagnosis (p=0.002), time from diagnosis to transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TUR-BT) (p=0.001), the time to re-TUR-BT (p<0.001) and time to adjuvant therapy (p=0.004) were significantly longer in the COVID-19 period. The maintenance bladder instillation rates were significantly lower in the COVID-19 period (p=0.028). The progression rates were similar in both periods (p=0.347), and the recurrence rate was significantly higher in the COVID-19 period (p=0.041). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly lower in the pre-COVID-19 period (p=0.024). In multivariate analysis, time from symptoms to diagnosis (p=0.030) and time to adjuvant therapy (p=0.010) were independent predictors of recurrence. Conclusion(s): NMIBC patients in the COVID-19 era had worse RFS outcomes. Especially with a delay of >7.5 weeks from symptoms to diagnosis and a delay of >3.5 weeks to adjuvant therapy, recurrence rates increase significantly. © Copyright 2022 by Urooncology Association Bulletin of Urooncology / Published by Galenos Yayinevi.

18.
Saudi J Biol Sci ; 30(3): 103561, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2183308

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is a pulmonary disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. More than 200 million individuals are infected by this globally. Pyrexia, coughing, shortness of breath, headaches, diarrhoea, sore throats, and body aches are among the typical symptoms of COVID-19. The virus enters into the host body by interacting with the ACE2 receptor. Despite many SARS-CoV-2 vaccines manufactured by distinct strategies but any evidence-based particular medication to combat COVID-19 is not available yet. However, further research is required to determine the safety and effectiveness profile of the present therapeutic approaches. In this study, we provide a summary of Traditional Arabic or Islamic medicinal (TAIM) plants' historical use and their present role as adjuvant therapy for COVID-19. Herein, six medicinal plants Aloe barbadensis Miller, Olea europaea, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Nigella sativa, Cassia angustifolia, and Ficus carica have been studied based upon their pharmacological activities against viral infections. These plants include phytochemicals that have antiviral, immunomodulatory, antiasthmatic, antipyretic, and antitussive properties. These bioactive substances could be employed to control symptoms and enhance the development of a possible COVID-19 medicinal synthesis. To determine whether or if these TAIMs may be used as adjuvant therapy and are appropriate, a detailed evaluation is advised.

19.
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst ; 34(1): 56, 2022 Dec 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2196560

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The theme of the St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2021 held virtually for the first time, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, was on tailoring therapies for patients with early breast cancer. A monkey survey that included an Egyptian Panel voted on most of the questions of the original St. Gallen consensus, and some added new questions most relevant to oncology practice in the country, to be able to compare voting results that reflect differences in breast cancer management and decision making. METHODS: The panel included 74 Egyptian scientists from different oncology specialties. Management issues including controversial diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were prepared by a small committee and then projected using the online monkey survey website: https://www.surveymonkey.com . The survey included 130 questions. Results were then analyzed, tabulated, and compared to the voting results of the original St. Gallen consensus. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Voting questions and resulting percentages of answers from the Egyptian panel were summarized. There was no consensus between the Egyptian and the original St. Gallen panels on 28/130 statements. They mostly included genetic and pathologic aspects, specifically the routine use of gene signature assays and a few queries involving surgical, radiotherapeutic, and systemic interventions. Probably, available resources and healthcare system differences in Egypt compared to European and the USA were the cause of these differences. This would also be applicable to other low- and low-middle-income healthcare scenarios present in many countries, especially with the present constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Egypt/epidemiology , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy
20.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases ; 9(Supplement 2):S85-S86, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2189538

ABSTRACT

Background. Vaccines aim to induce immune responses that prevent disease. They may also clear chronic infections or reduce tumor progression. Vaccine adjuvants augment immune responses, in general, by providing stimulatory signals. Our focus has been on a different type of adjuvant that enhances vaccine-induced T cell responses by modulating the herpes virus entry mediator (HVEM) pathway. The B and T cell attenuator (BTLA) is expressed on naive T cells and, upon binding to HVEM on antigen presenting cells, dampens signaling through the T cell receptor. HVEM binds with a different domain to the co-stimulator LIGHT. Within a trimolar BTLA-LIGHT/HVEM complex, inhibition prevails. Herpes simplex virus (HSV-1) glycoprotein D (gD) attaches to the BTLA binding site of HVEM and as it has higher binding affinity outcompetes BTLA binding and allows for co-stimulation through LIGHT. This results in enhanced signaling through the T cell receptor and thereby augments and broadens CD8+ T cell responses as we showed with chimpanzee adenovirus (AdC) vector vaccines for several viral antigens. Methods. Immunogenicity in rodents was evaluated following one or two immunizations with AdC vectors expressing antigens of HIV (gag), HPV-16 (E7/6/5), HBV (core & pol), influenza virus (nucleoprotein) and SARS-CoV2 (nucleoprotein), with or without gD. Vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell responses, including their magnitude, functions, duration, and breadth were characterized. Vaccine efficacy was also evaluated. Results. Vaccination with gD-antigen fusion proteins increased CD8+ T cell frequencies to all of the antigens tested (Fig) and improved efficacy. Addition of gD increased stimulation of CD8+ T cells to subdominant epitopes and thereby enhanced breadth of responses. Conclusion. Checkpoint modification of the HVEM pathway with a gD-antigen fusion protein produces potent, prolonged, and broad responses of CD8+ T cells to immunodominant and subdominant epitopes. The latter is especially important for chronic viral infections, where, due to exhaustion of T cells to dominant epitopes therapeutic efficacy of vaccines may rely on expansion of T cells to subdominant epitopes. Clinical studies to evaluate therapeutic vaccination for chronic HBV are planned. (Figure Presented).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL